Intel Drop #69 - The Charlie Kirk Assassination Psy Op, Mossad & Israel's Role
A quick reminder, all of our articles and Intel Drops can be found on our website at CBDCIntel.org and you can follow Bill's Twitter, contact Bill personally on his Telegram (billsweet1), follow our Official Twitter, our News Twitter and our Telegrams for updates (Comms, Public, News & Chat). Please bookmark and check our social media accounts weekly for updates.
Note: An updated FAQ, our gatekeeper list for 2025 & our full Intel Drop link list (#1-69) has been posted on our website. We have also added a new social site on Bastyon.
A Call To Action: We are asking our readers to share this Intel Drop on social media, Twitter / X, Telegram, TikTok and Facebook. We have been censored, shadow-banned and attacked for over two years. Without your help, no one would find our Intel Drops.
Our Team & Our Mission: Fill out our form & join our efforts to destroy Obsidian.
Editor's Note: Unlike past Intel Drops, we may update this Intel Drop as new facts and information become available. Any updates or edits to this Intel Drop will be announced on our Twitter and Telegram accounts.
Intel Drop #69 (white background version here)
The following was collated from intel sent to our team from Gideon. As always, all intel sent by Gideon is edited by Michael for clarity and for obfuscation purposes (see: Adversarial stylometry):
Bill: We had a few conversations this week, but I wanted to talk to you again so everything's up to date. You've set aside a fair amount of time for this, so we'll get going.
Gideon: "Please proceed, Bill."
Bill: Alright, the Charlie Kirk assassination is on everyone's minds. It's just a shocking, really sad moment, especially for his wife and kids. It's heartbreaking they had to witness that.
Gideon: "It is incredibly traumatic for them and for the public. We send our prayers to the family."
Bill: Now, you told me this is a very advanced, multi-layered event. It's not just a lone gunman, it's very complex. I'll let you restate some of what you told me.
Gideon: "Yes, I have been speaking with some of my sources on this. We believe this is similar to the Butler assassination attempt on Trump, in that it is staged to some degree and planned well in advance."
Bill: Ok, I just want to let readers know you had a take on this I haven't heard anywhere before, but we'll get to that in a minute. Let me just start with the event, the lead up to the final moments, we'll walk through it first, step by step. Where was the security?
Gideon: "Well, I will prepare my remarks by referencing a bit more backstory. It is claimed Mr. Kirk was wearing a bulletproof vest, which suggests some kind of concern over security.
We have some evidence he feared for his life if he 'went against Israel', this is stated by Harrison Smith, a correspondent at Infowars and other sources.
We know Mr. Kirk had recently spoken against Israel, in provocative fashion, entirely going against his staunch support of Israel over his career. This is all very important in context to leading up to this. I will discuss it more later on.
We go back to the event. The security is very poor, with no coverage at all of the rooftops that surrounded the low-elevation platform Mr. Kirk conducted his speech. Even a simple drone could be flown to observe the rooftops, easily.
A roof at a major university should not have easy access. This is due to protocols in place to prevent suicidal students from jumping off roofs. For an event like this, as well, all roof access should be cordoned off and secured. Doors should be locked. Access via climbing should be surveilled.
None of that was done, none of it, and it is not even difficult to do. We can safely conclude a stand-down was in place to allow certain things to transpire, so this is, by definition, a conspiracy."
Bill: I'll just add here, too, they violated the crime scene really quick, there's a guy caught taking down a camera that was behind Charlie within a few minutes after the shooting, so already there's a total violation of protocol and nothing is done about it.
Gideon: "Correct."
Bill: We now know who the alleged shooter is, this Tyler Robinson kid, we'll get to that, but let's go back to the events and work our way back to him. Charlie is shot, tell me what you think happened in that moment?
Gideon: "What occurred is extremely unusual, in terms of the moment he was shot. First, there are reports he had a bulletproof vest on, but it cannot be seen at all in any photos. He is wearing a thin, white t-shirt. One would expect something to be visible."
Bill: I saw someone say it was a Velocity Systems Special Threat Ceramic Composite Plate, which is low visibility, designed not to be seen at all under a shirt. Is that possible?
Gideon: "It is possible."
Bill: You told me it's not relevant as to the ballistics of what happened, why?
Gideon: "First, if he were wearing one it would have to be very lightweight since it cannot even be seen, so it would offer almost no protection against a large round nor would it cause anything to ricochet.
It only speaks to Mr. Kirk's state of mind and fears, so it is relevant in that sense, and I would like to know the truth of it, if he was wearing anything or not or planned to."
Bill: Alright, what about the shot itself? The impact, where it came from? There's tons of speculation about it, and I know you've been speaking to a source who has knowledge.
Gideon: "According to my source, Charlie Kirk was shot directly to his right by a sniper in the building. They said this is a cover-up of an incredible scale.
They said he was shot directly to the left from the vantage point of the viewing audience, or to Mr. Kirk's right side. Directly to his right, slightly above, from a window maybe 100 feet away. This is where a trained sniper was positioned.
The shot did not come from the rooftop, and in fact, I do not believe any shot from the rooftop was even fired."
Bill: I found someone making the claim on X that he was shot from behind, and many more claims. The shot maybe came from above, from the building or windows above and behind.
Gideon: "More or less, but it came directly from Mr. Kirk's right side, as I described. The bullet enters Mr. Kirk's right side of his head near his ear and an entry cannot be seen easily, as would be expected. Entry wounds are not always visible, but exit wounds are graphic.
We saw the graphic explosion on his left side. The bullet came out of his neck on his left side. Nothing was shot directly at him, from the front, at all.
Now, some will claim a .30-06 round to the right temple of the head would cause incredible damage, and it would, but this was probably not that round. It may have been a .223 or .22, a smaller round, and the damage we see would be consistent with a smaller round. If this is a professional sniper, they would not use a .30-06 round that close. So the damage we see is consistent, to me."
Bill: I finally found a video (credit @FringeViews on X) that seems to verify what you are saying, it shows an actual muzzle flash. I shared this with you, had you seen this before?
Gideon: "No, but it fully verifies what one of my sources told me. That video shows the shot that killed him, without question. The muzzle flash is clear. Let us examine this."
[Conversation goes off record for a moment while video-sharing and analysis is conducted by both Bill and Gideon]
Gideon: "Scroll through the video, watch for other flashes, like window glints, there are none. That is a muzzle flash from the building window or doorway above and it perfectly coincides with the injury and the sound. Perfectly."
Bill: That's amazing, I see it. I found a good video that illustrates what you're saying, too, the entry and exit, from Charlie's right to left, from the side, not the front. If we establish he was shot from the right, and it looks very possible, it changes it everything.
Gideon: "It does."
Bill: Why would they do that, though, if they have a perched rooftop shooter?
Gideon: "They needed a pasty up there and a real shot to come from somewhere else.
They may have also decided using a professional sniper on the roof presented a high risk of being caught or seen. We can see the patsy was videotaped and could have easily been seen or caught at any point jumping off the roof as he left, he just was not.
So, there would be a reason they would want the professional more concealed, and if being inside the building to Mr. Kirk's right is more concealed, which it appeared to be, you have your answer."
Bill: Did the pasty know their role? I mean, they had a gun and fired, too.
Gideon: "They could have been given the gun with blank rounds, and the lethal shot could be silenced. How it was timed, though, seems implausible.
I believe the sound we hear on audio is the real shot from the sniper to the right. Timing it so the rooftop shooter fires a blank and the real shooter fires a suppressed shot at the precise, exact same time seems, again, implausible but with advanced technology, possible. It means the patsy would believe they were taking a real shot.
Or, they simply got on the roof, prone, did not fire, and the sound of the shot is from the shot that came from the right.
I am more of the belief the person seen on the surveillance video is an operator themselves, a professional, doing all the steps, short of actually firing a shot. The pathway in and out would be cleared so he could not be caught.
His job was to provide the official story, that someone shot from the roof, but he may not have fired anything. Later, a patsy would be blamed, which is the Robinson boy.
It is difficult to break this down, but this is what we are dealing with. They want this to be confusing for anyone trying to figure it out, that is the point of any conspiracy, to ensure it cannot be figured out."
Bill: I'll get back to the direction of the shot here. People all say it came from the front, from the rooftop, and they go on and on about it bouncing off this non-existent vest he's supposedly wearing. I see this being discussed ad nauseam online. You said all of that discussion is totally irrelevant.
Gideon: "I think the discussion about this vest he does not appear to be wearing is irrelevant. Even if he had a vest on, the idea of a .30-06 round or even fragment bouncing up into his neck is almost absurd. Now, if his body armor was a metal plate or bigger, yes that could happen, but he does not even appear to be wearing any body armor.
The neck wound is strange if it came from the front, as well. It looks like an exit wound, not an entry wound. A casual observer would not know that, though. The average person thinks a gunshot is like a Hollywood film, blood will just go everywhere, but not in reality. Entry and exit are different, even with a high powered round."
Bill: There's one video from his right side and you can't see anything, someone said you should be able to see something if he was shot in his right temple or neck (Edit: You can see entry here).
Gideon: "You would not see hardly anything, the bullet goes directly in and then explodes out on his left side with blood. The entry point would be a small dot possibly with some blood, but not blood that is spewing out. And again, the real shot was probably from a smaller round."
Bill: People are talking about how his shirt bounces up, how his body moves this way or that way. What's your analysis?
Gideon: "His body jerks from the impact, his shirt lifts up a bit, he then slumps to his left. All consistent with a shot to the head or neck from his right side, exiting his left neck.
I see nothing unusual about his shirt movement, at impact there was a shock, even a shock wave, he was hit like a brick being thrown at him and his body jerked and his shirt dislodged. If he were shot in the front, he would probably slump back, instead, he slumps to his left, because he had been shot in the right side of his head."
Bill: Why would the cabal risk shooting him from the side like that, in case it looks off or doesn't look like he was shot from the front?
Gideon: "I think they would know what to expect. They would know the exit neck wound would look like something plausibly hit him from the front or slightly off to the side.
Even the rooftop shooter's alleged shot was claimed to come slightly over to Mr. Kirk's right, so it is plausible to shoot directly from his right and still have a scene of misdirection that works."
Bill: There's so much to go over here. Now, there was talk of A.I. online, talk about his ring moving around to another finger, talk of squibs and this being fake. Please address all that.
Gideon: "I do not believe at this time the death was fake or staged. Some new iPhones use A.I. upscaling, resulting in some distortions. Those in the crowd could be using new phones that use A.I. upscaling. I have seen minor distortions, such as the 'Freedom' writing on his t-shirt, but they are very minor.
Furthermore, it would be virtually impossible for a squib to have been placed on his neck to display that kind of blood. Even a Hollywood film would need multiple takes and CGI to simulate that, and it is even dangerous to do. Too much can go wrong, and if he were walking around with that concealed with make-up for very long on his neck, I think it would be noticed or photographed. There is nothing there.
As for the ring, it was a ring that opened and closed, and he was fidgeting with it, which he often did. It was opened, dislodged and eventually fell off, something that can be seen in the final frames of one of the most widely-seen videos. So, it is not an A.I. artifact, though it looks like it is changing from one finger to another.
One question is why there are not more videos, but we should remember most spectators were supporters of Mr. Kirk, they were Mormon, who are a group of people who generally have high morals, and they would likely feel it inappropriate to upload graphic images of his death.
With that said, I am still a bit perplexed by the lack of more videos, though they may begin to emerge soon. If they do not, we need to question that, because there are more. We can even identify probably ten people alone filming or taking photos from some background shots at the time of the shooting."
Bill: There's a lot of talk of a couple of guys giving hand signals right before Charlie's shot, they're sort of standing off to the side of him. Have you seen those videos?
Gideon: "Yes."
Bill: What's your conclusion?
Gideon: "Inconclusive and speculative. People make gestures all the time, but if there was coordinated signaling, it would look just like what those men were doing, too.
One of the men, though, is a Dr. Turek, a close friend of Mr. Kirk. I see he has done nothing suspicious other than adjust his hat.
If the shot is from the right side, from a window or doorway in the building, I would suspect with Mr. Kirk being broadcast on loudspeakers, the shooter would be able to hear what he said and time it properly. It was timed with a question about gun violence. He would not need signals, or he might have some audio in an earpiece picking up what Mr. Kirk was saying. I do not think signals were needed, nor do I really see any."
Bill: Have you seen the video of the guy with the blue shirt and his arms crossed, he's standing to Charlie's right? He's older, mostly bald. People think he fired a gun from under his arm.
Gideon: "You showed it to me other day."
Bill: I remember now.
Gideon: "His arms are simply crossed. If he fired something, it would show some kind of muzzle flash or distortion, and nothing is seen when the shot is fired.
Plus, aiming that way is nearly impossible, impossible to aim accurately holding a gun under your arm while looking forward. With that said, his glasses could have a digital readout showing Mr. Kirk to his right with an aiming mechanism, but that is speculation."
Bill: He walks back oddly, too, what did you think of that?
Gideon: "Yes, initially, but then he moves forward and moves toward Mr. Kirk. His behavior is normal. He is not trying to escape or vanish. I am seeing short, cut clips presenting an inaccurate timeline trying to fit a narrative. Longer clips show more of the movement of everyone.
I see nothing suspicious within the vicinity of Mr. Kirk, and there is no need to stage or plant people to do suspicious things to begin with. This is a serious operation, they are not going to place people in full view doing odd things of that nature for no reason. They want people to believe a lone shooter did this and that is all.
People are just speculating about what they see, which is normal, we saw that with Trump's assassination attempt, too."
Bill: A George Zim made a scene, sort of acted like he was the shooter, he was detained then released. Some are saying he's Jewish, he was at 9/11, he had something to do with the Boston bombing. Do you know about this?
Gideon: "I heard a bit about him, yes."
Bill: Right, I checked and I found he posted this odd testimonial about 9/11 but he was not there at the time, he was in Denver. So, he was not actually there. A YouTube video of him talking about it is gone, but this is still on X. And his connection to the Boston bombing is there, documented, but not really significant. To me, this guy looks like a plant placed as a distraction.
Gideon: "If you want to argue he is Jewish and has these odd connections, yes, I would say that is worth exploring. It could also be happenstance he was there and made a disruption, or a phone call could have been placed and it could have been suggested he be there and be ready for something."
Bill: To what extent do you think the authorities would be "in" on this operation? I mean local cops, his security and so on?
Gideon: "You would need a few. Usually, the cabal has people in place in all of these capacities. They are often just given orders, and the nature of what is going on is compartmentalized."
Bill: George Webb is an investigator who makes the point that a lot of Sheriffs were put in position after committing crimes in Vietnam and Iraq, that just made me think how easy it would be for the cabal to use these people. They would be blackmailed.
Gideon: "Certainly."
Bill: What do you think of George's work? He's got a substack up I'll link to about the assassination, a lot of theories there.
Gideon: "I read it. He used A.I. to write the articles and used A.I. for the photos. That is a major red flag. If someone uses a little bit of A.I. I can forgive that, because it can be helpful, but using an entirely A.I.-generated article? I am not interested in that.
Some of his theories are half-baked, as well. He is throwing a lot at the wall. I would use discernment when viewing his conclusions and material."
Bill: Thank you, I agree. I don't think he's a gatekeeper, do you?
Gideon: "We have not checked on him in Obsidian. Until then, I would not reach a conclusion either way. He has a very large following on X and relatively high engagement. The cabal would not allow that if he were a serious threat, I can say that."
Bill: Ok, I could be mistaken here, but I'm pretty sure George Webb doesn't talk much about Israel. He talks a lot about drug running, the CIA and so on, but not much about Israel. If I'm wrong on that, I'm sorry to George, we'll correct or edit this later if I'm wrong, but my point here is, can a source be trusted who doesn't talk about Israel or ignores Israel?
Gideon: "No. They are either ignorant or an agent."
Bill: Ok, we'll get back to the timeline here. Mr. Kirk is taken to the hospital, no real details given about his injuries, I guess the family wants all that private, but we just don't have absolute proof of his death. They're saying he may be presented to lie in state at the Capitol, so his body might end up being viewed there. His wife posted a video of him in his casket, did you see that?
Gideon: "No."
(Bill shares video with Gideon)
Gideon: "That is consistent with an embalmed body. I see nothing here of curiosity."
Bill: People are upset his wife showed a video of him, touching his hands. Do you find that odd?
Gideon: "I would not impugn her for that."
Bill: What about her statement she made, her TV statement? People are saying it's not authentic.
(Gideon views Erika Kirk's statement)
Gideon: "Inconclusive. Everyone responds to tragedy differently. She may feel her husband would want her to fight on, to carry on what they felt was their mission."
Bill: Ok, I was rambling a bit, but I have a point here, people are saying Charlie's still alive. Kash Patel made reference to Valhalla, the norse heaven, but also a supposed underground cabal protective area in Kansas, something said by gatekeeper and Q Anon purveyor Juan O'Savin. So speculation is running Charlie was taken there. Where are you on all this?
Gideon: "This goes to a larger point I spoke with you about. The A.I. is placing red herrings everywhere, false leads, rabbit holes to nowhere, and the gatekeepers are quite busy, because the A.I. knows the Internet will run wild with conspiracy theories.
Mr. Patel is also a former influencer known to push Q Anon theories. Would the cabal instruct him to make this statement about Valhalla and about the 33 hours? Possibly, probably."
Bill: Ok, I mentioned before you said something very interesting, let me set that up. You told me right after this happened that the fact the shooter hadn't been identified for so long, what ended up being a day and half, or as Kash Patel said, 33 hours, there was a lot of time there. A lot of time where we knew almost nothing, it was just a blank canvas to fill in with guesswork. You said that was intentional, that time. Why?
Gideon: "To allow for conspiratorial theories to flourish, especially those relating to Mossad or Israel being behind the attack.
These theories proliferated so much that Greta Van Susteren, in an interview with Benjamin Netanyahu, referenced them and directly asked the Prime Minister about them. He then replied with a rather long diatribe dismissing the theories.
I found that highly irregular, because in the past, the media would provide a firewall against those theories so the public would not be presented with them. Here, the media addresses them, directly. That means it is being put into the public consciousness intentionally by the cabal. There are also many mainstream news stories addressing the theories directly.
Now, the authorities already knew who the shooter was, or patsy, they knew of him quickly. The 33 hour wait to reveal it all is irregular. They claim the father turned in the shooter. They claim they really knew nothing. This is not true, they knew. And, of course, Patel references Freemason numerology with 33, which is actually Satanic numerology.
It is my belief, my strong belief, that the cabal and the A.I. allowed theories to proliferate that would point to this being a Mossad operation, at first. There is a reason for this, I believe the cabal is setting up Israel without their knowledge, but we can discuss more on that later."
Bill: Ok, for those who don't know, Charlie Kirk is listed as a Cabal Sovereign on our gatekeeper list. I always thought he'd done his duty for the cabal over the years, he was a good servant. He always supported Israel, almost to a fault, but that changed, that changed a lot.
Gideon: "It did. Mr. Kirk had recently made a few stunning statements against the narrative, against Israel.
He had openly suggested if not outright declared that Jeffery Epstein was a Mossad agent, which he was. He demanded the Epstein files all be released. He had questioned if the October 7th event in Israel was a staged event or false flag, allowed to happen, which it was.
He had spoken against the push for antisemitism laws to curtail free speech. He had said and done even more than all of that against Israel, for example, hosting anti-Israel people like Dave Smith at a Turning Point USA conference, something Israeli agent Laura Loomer complained about.
Then, he spoke to Megyn Kelly in a interview in which he describes many of his Jewish friends texting him almost veiled threats, calling him an antisemite. He seemed disturbed by this, and so was Ms. Kelly. They both said they had been strong supporters of Israel, and seemed perplexed they were not allowed to even question anything related to Israel or Jews, not a single thing, without being called an antisemite.
What we have here is a remarkable chain of events that tie into the assassination."
Bill: What's crazy is Fox News aired this tribute featuring Charlie Kirk's utter devotion to Israel which Benjamin Netanyahu hosts, almost like they wanted to re-write history or try to cover up the fact Charlie was changing his mind on Israel. I keep seeing a lot of that, saying he loved Israel, on and on with it. So, what's the cabal goal here?
Gideon: "It is multi-layered. There is no question Israel and Mossad wanted to deal with Mr. Kirk in some way, at first, probably with veiled threats. They were certainly surveilling him. They knew he was changing his narrative, changing his mind. In public, he began to walk it back, but he knew the truth, and they knew he knew the truth.
They knew there was no going back for Mr. Kirk, the can of worms had already been opened for him. It seemed Mr. Kirk had a conscience about it, his own thoughts, he was not just a puppet on strings.
Now, we see the planning of the assassination, but I believe that planning was far more in advance than even Mossad might be aware of."
Bill: How do you mean?
Gideon: "I believe the cabal planned all of this even beyond Israel's involvement.
There is also a secondary plan, one Israel will execute, to deal with those like Mr. Kirk, of which there are now millions upon millions all over the world whose opinions on Israel and Zionism are irrevocably set in stone and will not change, especially among young people.
Israel's coming wrath against those who have turned against them will be without restraint."
Bill: Is that a good thing, though, that people are waking up to Israel?
Gideon: "Absolutely, it is. But, Israel is not the top of the cabal, they are just part of it. Removing Zionism does not remove the cabal."
Bill: You've said before that X is a honey pot to collect all of the antisemites and place them on the Restricted and Quarantined list in Obsidian. Is that still the plan?
Gideon: "It is."
Bill: But, you're saying Israel is going to be destroyed?
Gideon: "Again, not now. A lot will play out before then, if it even happens. But, I have been told it will. It is so far off, I would not focus on that right now.
What I am talking about is that something is telling me this event, Mr. Kirk's death, the way it was allowed that people speculate Mossad did this, the 33 hours, something tells me the cabal had hand in this.
But, Israel did not have a hand in allowing the speculation, and they are responding ferociously with their own damage control right now."
Bill: You've told me the cabal is doing something you call containment vectoring, they're creating different constituencies here, please explain that.
Gideon: "They are. The cabal wants different groups believing strongly in different things.
They want the anti-Israel group to believe Mr. Kirk was murdered because of his beliefs on Israel. Ironically, in this case, what the cabal wants this containment group to believe is actually the truth, or very close to it, but I see gatekeepers are already confusing and misdirecting this group with falsehoods, which the cabal would also want.
Then they want the Left to believe Mr. Richardson was a Trump-supporting, gun-toting conservative who ran in online Groyper circles, and everything points to that conclusion, if you only look at certain data.
They want the Right to believe Mr. Richardson was a former conservative who was recently radicalized, recently involved with ANTIFA, recently expressed hatred of Mr. Kirk, even engraved Leftist-aligned sayings on his bullet casings, and everything points to that conclusion, if you only look at certain data.
They are creating containment vectors to control parts of the population and it is being done with great precision."
Bill: Incredible. What about the private jet that took off 30 minutes after the assassination? A lot of people thought maybe the sniper got on the plane. Even I bought into that for a minute. What's your take there?
Gideon: "A red herring, but intentional. The plane is owned by individuals with connections to Israel, rather significant connections. This allows for conspiracy theories to run rampant."
Bill: You don't think the sniper got on the plane or anything?
Gideon: "Possible, but unlikely. No need to place him on a private jet. There are better ways to conceal him. Some of the reporting about the ADS-B transponder being turned off is not correct, either.
I believe the flight was routine, but possibly coordinated in advance so it would be looked at right away, and the Israel connections found. I find it beyond coincidence, but I think the flight itself is benign.
Again, I think there is a hand directing things here that is beyond Mossad and U.S. intelligence, what would be a higher echelon of the cabal."
Bill: Trump's reaction and Netanyahu's reaction was instant, almost simultaneous Tweets right after the shooting, then Trump makes some A.I.-made statement, then later Trump has a blast at the Yankees game, dancing around, then he's later asked how he's doing emotionally after Kirk's passing and he dismisses the question and talks about White House renovations. What are these two leaders really thinking?
Gideon: "They are both glad that Mr. Kirk is gone because Mr. Kirk was about to become a very, very big problem for both of them and they knew it."
Bill: Right, because Charlie Kirk was really pushing for the Epstein files to be released. The cabal doesn't want those released, right?
Gideon: "The cabal does not care at all, but the lower echelons do, the lower tier of the hierarchy, the Israel tier, which is to say, the USA-tier as well, since they are one in the same. They do care because they can be exposed by Epstein.
I have never quite seen this before, but they are actually nervous, this Administration, it is strange to see."
Bill: This false awakening and destruction of Israel, which you think is Biblical, you said a lot will happen before then. What will happen?
Gideon: "We are about to see the floor fall out from the economy, it is already on the brink. We are going to see war escalation. We are going to see the push for Digital I.D., then digital money, and eventually, Obsidian will take over. We will see a pandemic this Winter, a real one this time.
We are truly at the absolute end point before all of this happens. We are going to see a complete unraveling.
So much is going to happen before this bigger plan plays out, and I think that bigger plan, that final plan, is still transhumanist and completely evil in nature, and it will involve Obsidian, it will just seem like it is not.
As for Israel and the Jews, they will fight to the bitter end, they will do all they can to retain power and the cabal is going to allow them to do everything they can.
I am talking about violence, destruction, collapse, Israel will commit every atrocity imaginable to further their own goals, which include Greater Israel, the destruction of the White race, collapsing America and installing Obsidian.
Yes, Israel is behind Obsidian, they work with Alex Karp and U.S. politicians to install it, but they do not fully control it."
Bill: Now, before I forget, why did Charlie Kirk start to question Israel if he was a cabalist, a Sovereign?
Gideon: "Because, as I said in our last Intel Drop, there is a hierarchy and the cabal uses their own to further the agenda. They will even sacrifice their own, and they do.
Not every cabalist is aware of the full agenda, or how they are being used for it. Mr. Kirk was a cabal servant for years, then began to question Israel. I also do not believe Mr. Kirk was a bad person, but blinded by the promises offered by the cabal. A source of mine also said the cabal deceived him on certain things.
I have asked our whistleblowers to check his Obsidian account so we can learn more or see if there are any irregularities. In any case, his questioning of Israel appeared genuine, but he was conflicted, as well. He had been presented with evidence that directly opposed his lifetime of programming that instructed him that Israel was a good, holy state, which it is not."
Bill: Do you think the cabal saw him turning against Israel and maybe pushed him along in that way, to use him later on, for this greater plan?
Gideon: "It is very possible. It is possible some cabalists are kept in the dark about certain things or agendas, I entirely suspect that. I spoke of how I think Tucker Carlson may lead this new movement against Israel, but it will be a cabal-controlled movement."
Bill: Alright, we've covered this at length. My last thought, what do you think of the shooter, possibly, the patsy? Tyler Robinson? We have to talk about him.
Gideon: "We have to be extremely cautious here because the evidence trail is weak. The public does not think it is weak, but it is.
We have seen authorities claim Discord messages were seen discussing gun drops, engraved bullet casings, a gun wrapped in a towel. But, the Discord company said no such messages from Tyler Robinson existed at all.
There were, instead, messages from his roommate and his friend talking on Discord about these things that they had seen in a note. A note. What note? Now the real source of the evidence is a so-called note, not actual messages written on Discord by Mr. Robinson.
So, we have a note. Written by whom? That is very odd to me. Look carefully at the evidence placed on Mr. Robinson, the evidence is weak."
Bill: You also told me a couple days ago that all the wild speculation after the event would lead to a convincing patsy or even the killer, it did. Convincing in the sense the public would "buy it", basically. You said this was so the Mossad-speculators would lose some credibility, they probably did, or their theories would lose steam. Amazing, because this shooter they brought out, it looks like him on the security footage, the footage before where he's walking through the neighborhood, the footage after as he climbs down. So, you think the cabal sort of set up the Mossad-theorists this way?
Gideon: "They did, and again, it is about containment vectors. They delayed the facts by 33 hours, even though they knew everything from the very moment it happened, and prior to that. The cabal was not going to allow the Mossad theorists win the narrative, just part of it.
Now, the Mossad theorists will have to contend with a so-called 'pasty' who is quite convincing in terms of being placed at the scene. People are going to now say, 'Israel had nothing to do with this.' We are seeing how the cabal is moving narratives so rapidly and expertly."
Bill: It's interesting, it's like the cabal is just playing around with the anti-Israel crowd, like a cat plays with a toy. Using them and moving them in different directions, but not censoring them, like in the past?
Gideon: "Precisely. We should not be led to think the cabal is on our side in desiring to destroy Israel. The cabal is evil and not on humanity's side, but I believe the cabal is prepared to let Israel destroy itself and not intervene to save it at some point."
Bill: Is this all a distraction? I've seen people say the entire thing is a distraction.
Gideon: "No. I personally believe the event is important enough to examine. This event was important to the cabal's narrative agenda. It will have many future effects and consequences. It happened a day before the 9/11 anniversary. It is a significant event. I felt it appropriate to dedicate an Intel Drop to this."
Bill: Just a few more thoughts on Robinson. What really happened, do you think? Was he at the scene?
Gideon: "I do not know, I can only speculate, but I have seen no speculation online that points to one, possible scenario, and that is that an operative who looked like Mr. Robinson climbed the roof, sat in a prone position with a gun, did not fire, jumped off the roof and left.
Later, Mr. Robinson is simply framed for all of it, based literally on one thing, a planted note. The note is discussed by the roommate to a friend on Discord, it then makes its way to the family, to the father, and so on.
A cascading series of events pinning everything on Mr. Robinson based on literally no evidence other than a note.
Outside of that, we have heard nothing from Mr. Robinson, no statement, nothing (Edit: He is not cooperating with authorities, has not confessed to the crime and is on suicide watch). His prior online activity suggests to me he would be easily surveilled by intelligence, by Mossad, and identified as an easy pasty and blamed for the event."
Bill: I got you, you've got a professional walking through the hallways, he's filmed, it looks like he has a gun but there's zero proof he does, maybe he had nothing, just something that looked like a gun? Then they blame it on Robinson.
Gideon: "Correct. He simply goes up to the roof, and this would be coordinated for him by the university staff on hand working with the cabal, the doors are left open, access ignored by security. He traces all the steps of a shooter, but fires no shot. Because the real shot has come from the window below to Mr. Kirk's right.
We cannot know that he has a gun, we just assume that. The gun found in the forest is evidence of nothing, actually.
We also know there are 3000 cameras at the campus and we have been shown a few fuzzy photos and one fuzzy video. It is absurd to suggest there are no more photos of this person. There are. We are just shown enough to 'prove' a narrative without really proving anything."
Bill: What about his shoes? They matched Robinson's.
Gideon: "The operatives would have a file on Robinson, even his Obsidian file, so they would know to get matching shoes for the individual posing as Robinson."
Bill: I mean, it's incredible how you're outlining how they could easily frame this kid, easily.
Gideon: "Yes. They would be able to pinpoint and find a psychological profile that would perfectly fit their narrative out of all those students. In this case, Mr. Robinson is not even present there, he lives in St. George now, which is even more strange, more than three hours away by car.
They found someone with a background that is politically all over the map and simply framed him. Utah also has an entrenched group of ANTIFA and Left radicals, it would not be hard to find a pasty or even someone willing to work with them on this operation."
Bill: I saw something incredible, there's an article describing some of the Discord messages. Now, the Discord company seems to be contradicting the FBI, saying Mr. Robinson didn't incriminate himself in any messages, but he did talk to his friends. In one message he literally says, this is from the New York Post, "The accused gunman went on to mock the FBI’s investigation, referencing the 'trans' scribblings found on the ammunition and claiming it was all fabricated by some 'dude in the briefing room.'" Now, that's amazing to me, because it sounds almost like something we would say, to imply the FBI just made up the story, which does sound completely absurd, that he had Leftist sayings engraved on the bullet casings. There's other things his friends talk about in their Discord group, joking about the shooting, but not in a nasty way, more in a way to say, "Hey, this guy on the video looks like you, should we turn you in for the reward money?" This is incredible to me, because these kids are joking as if he is not involved at all.
Gideon: "Well, all of that is quite telling. It shows he does not want to take credit for the bullet casing engravings among his friends, he dismisses it, mocks it. I think that says a lot of his state of mind.
If you are going to go to the extent to engrave the casings, one would assume you would not want that mocked or dismissed. Here, he is dismissing it as fictional, as if it was made up by the FBI.
He is not passionate, not a true believer, in a sense. Usually in these cases, a mentally unstable person would want to defend their work among their friends, at least subtly or you may see him show some consternation at their own mocking and jokes, he did the opposite."
Bill: For sure, it's just not the impression we were given, that these were a group of kids who hated Charlie Kirk and who were sort of conspiring. They're more just observing the event and making immature jokes. Now, later on, we find out his roommate turned him in, but that seems to be based on this so-called "note" that was found, not on actual Discord messages in which he incriminated himself, which he didn't, according to the company! It's just wild, it makes me think a note could have been planted.
Gideon: "What people must realize is that in this situation, a single piece of fabricated evidence could impugn a person, if there is some existing evidence - even if totally innocuous - when placed in the context of an incriminating note, now everyone is making conclusions."
Bill: Right, they see this note, then they might say, "Well, he did say something nasty about Charlie Kirk at dinner the other night." I see what you mean. Are you conclusively saying Mr. Robinson wasn't there? Wasn't involved?
Gideon: "No, I am speculating. He absolutely could have been there, the person seen on the video tapes, some of the images released. He could be that person, though physically they do not quite match. He could be that person.
But that alone does not prove he took a shot, and there is no actual evidence of a gun, just that he is carrying something that could be a gun.
We could also speculate he was told to do these things, go the campus, carry a weapon or something that looked like one, sit in the prone position on the roof, get up, walk away, and so on. That is more implausible to me, but possible.
Why would he do that? A variety of reasons. Threats, money. He is told he does not need to kill Mr. Kirk, someone else will be blamed, but they need him for this operation? A 22 year old is not wise or smart in any traditional sense. They can be manipulated, and nano dust can be activated."
Bill: Do you think they will get rid of him like Oswald? That always seems to happen.
Gideon: "Be prepared for that, yes."
Bill: Alright, I just want to be clear, you're speculating. I mean, tomorrow the cabal might release conclusive evidence he did this or did something.
Gideon: "Yes, but nothing the cabal releases is conclusive. I would say convincing is a better word."
Bill: Are we one hundred percent on the shot being from the right going through the left, not from the front?
Gideon: "I place it at 90% confidence. The other 10% can be anything, a shooter in the crowd, manipulated videos the cabal released and curated, there can be anything. He could have been shot or killed by a drone.
I think the important takeaway here is a direct shot from 200 yards up and in front, into the left neck side, does not match what we observed.
The muzzle flash captured by the video is also compelling, because there are no other flashes like it, no window glints that I could see, and it happens the moment the shot is fired, and the impact is actually delayed by nanoseconds, as you would expect, the bullet had to travel a bit to get there after the muzzle flash.
Now, could that be something else and not a muzzle flash? Of course. We do not know for certain."
Bill: We've covered a lot here, should we move on to other issues?
Gideon: "We can."
Bill: We announced there were serious security issues after our last Intel Drop, we didn't say much else. Can you reveal what's going on?
Gideon: "One of our comms methods was removed by the cabal and our own comms, between you and me, which is separate, was also disrupted. So, we have been dealing with that."
Bill: You said you think it's a warning because of the video we are going to release?
Gideon: "Yes, and we plan to still release it. I received approval, but we are not doing it if it is going to be ignored or no action is taken by our supporters to spread the word. We are not going to risk this person's life for nothing. They took a great risk to provide the video, which shows Obsidian's USDR operations."
Bill: You've expressed to me a lot of frustration with the public overall, and I completely agree with it. We have given people direct evidence of what is coming and no one cares. They can do something about it, they do nothing.
Gideon: "Our Intel Drops are long and we do not post videos. The cabal has trained people to have short attentions spans. We do not release rapid-fire clickbait, nor we have the support of the cabal's gatekeeper network. All of these people with large followings are well-funded, we are not.
We have asked for help, that is all we can do. Our team is the focus and the priority, but as we close in on the end game, the final days we have left, my guide had pushed me to do more and we will try to do more."
Bill: Can you give a final synopsis of this assassination? The purpose, the goal? Some final words.
Gideon: "Yes. Almost certainly, Mr. Kirk was eliminated due to his increasingly suspicious views of Israel, which were deep and nuanced, not simply one or two remarks.
Was Mossad and Israel responsible for staging this assassination? I would say yes, but I suspect some higher echelons of the cabal are guiding things.
Was this a lone gunman, a one-off radical who took one shot? No, it is far more than that. It is a conspiracy. The security stand-down and various oddities and contradictions in the investigation point to that, if not fully prove that.
As for the family of Mr. Robinson, they could be turned simply by being presented false evidence. If it is a law enforcement family or religious family, they tend to trust law enforcement, so they may go along with things, naively.
We will watch the case with Mr. Robinson. I still leave open he could be a guilty party, he could be involved, but I am very doubtful of that right now. I would lean toward his total innocence. This is something that may never see trial. He may not live to see it. I think we should be worried for his life.
I would encourage readers to hit back against the propaganda and falsehoods being promulgated, and hopefully direct people to this Intel Drop so they can be corrected on some of the false things they are being told."
Bill: Thank you. We'll bring this to a close. We'll have to stay focused on Obsidian, that's really the bigger issue here, one people are totally distracted from right now because of this.
Gideon: "The public is completely blind to what is coming, and we are much closer than people realize. The next few months will see major events."
Bill: Ok, be safe and we'll talk again soon, God bless.
Gideon: "You too, Bill."
---
Our Team & Our Mission: Fill out our form & join our efforts to destroy Obsidian.
Please share this article, so we can keep spreading the word. Join our Telegrams (group, announcements, news, spiritual discussion). Join Bill's Twitter here, and our official We Are Sovereign Twitter here. Our official email is securecommssov@proton.me.
Update: We continue to see serious problems with email. Emails like MSN, Me, iCloud, Outlook, AOL, Gmail, Gmx, Yahoo, Hotmail, Comcast and many others routinely BLOCK and CENSOR our emails. These email providers are also known to read your emails and offer no security at all. No one should be using them, but many people who contact us are using them.
We recommend opening an anonymous account using Proton.me, Hushmail.com, Tutanota.com. These providers are end to end encrypted, and have proven they do not block our emails.
Update: If you have recently found our information, we recommend reading all of our posts going back to July of 2022, which have covered a multitude of issues in detail. You can find an introductory article here, our new Intel Drops here, and our older (censored) Intel Drops and (censored) website backed-up here via PDF (Telegram link for download), Google Drive PDF (Intel Drop #1 starts at page 105) or here via the Wayback Machine.
Note: We also recommend reading our Cosmic Rules Are About To Change series of Intel Drops for the full context of what is transpiring from a spiritual perspective (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, and Part 7).